Malicious screen scraping: Worth preventing?
2009-09-29
A number of recent cases have heightened the profile of screen
scraping. But why should firms now be looking out for screen scraping
issues that could affect them? Is it that much of a problem that it
deserves a business' attention?
According to TJ McIntyre, a lecturer in law at University College
Dublin and chairman of Digital Rights Ireland, screen scraping is
already quite a big issue. While not every scenario would create as
much publicity as others, there have been a number of cases in the US
involving screen scraping. He pointed to one example involving eBay
and Bidder's Edge, where the latter was taking data from the auction
website
Although Mr McIntyre said that while screen scraping is not
necessarily something that could cause damage, the question lies with
whether or not "there is a legitimate public interest in being able to
reuse information and present it on a website in other contexts".
There is also a question over whether there would be any
countervailing intellectual property rights issues arising from this.
"Really the question is whether what is involved is something that is
actually causing damage to the other firm's server, by overloading it
for example," the expert commented.
Another issue with screen scraping is whether it either prejudices a
company or if it is actually beneficial for the business that is
scraped, Mr McIntyre commented. Screen scrapers can, in fact, draw
attention to other sites' services in a positive way, he noted.
"Search engines present much the same issues with regards to the
publicity they give to sites," Mr McIntyre continued. In this case,
the question becomes whether a screen scraping site is displaying
information that will direct the user towards a particular site or if
the data is leading to a drop in traffic from the scraped company, in
turn affecting a business. For the latter, it is as though the
business has been somewhat "siphoned off", he stated.
The expert noted that often technical counter measures have been used
to prevent screen scrapers from appropriating data. For example,
certain IP ranges might be blocked from accessing a website, he said.
So what measures are available to organisations?
According to Sentor MSS, businesses need an advanced system that can
analyse traffic and then notify them when someone downloads too much
information from their database. The firm provides a managed
anti-scraping service named ASSASSIN that can detect and block the
most sophisticated scraper in real time. Sentor guarantees that all
scraping activity on a website will be blocked within minutes of
detection with this system in place, in turn effectively protecting
the firm's intellectual property.
Human supervision is also required by those organisations hoping to
stop such scraping activity, according to Sentor, and experienced
operators are needed in addition to systems such as ASSASSIN.
A recent case perhaps emphasised what can come about as a result of
screen scraping activity. The Irish Times reported that advertising
firm JC Decaux had launched a case against web design organisation
Fusio over an iPhone application it produced for the Dublinbikes scheme.
Talking to the publication, Mr McIntyre commented: "Irrespective of
the law regulating screen scraping, it is absurd and undesirable that
a venture which is set up and run in conjunction with a public body
should be attempting to prevent the public from accessing information
about the service."
It appears that both public and private bodies can be affected by
screen scraping activity. If this screen scraping is damaging a
company, it could look to use services such as Sentor's to prevent any
negative impact on its business.

Directory






